When the Digital Rights Summit RightsCon 2026 Fell Silent
Screenshot from RightsCon website
In early May 2026, specifically from 5th to 8th May, Lusaka was expected to host one of the world’s most influential gatherings on technology and human rights, called RightsCon. Activists, policymakers, journalists, and technologists from across the globe were preparing to convene for RightsCon, a summit known for shaping global conversations on digital freedoms, privacy, and governance. Instead, the conference never happened.
Just days before its opening, the Zambian government announced the postponement of RightsCon 2026, citing administrative and security concerns. What initially appeared to be a temporary delay quickly unraveled into something more definitive. Within hours, organizers and participants began to acknowledge what many suspected: the event had effectively been canceled. Read the full statement by RightsCon and Access Now team to the community about the reason behind the cancellation
The abrupt decision has raised serious questions not only about Zambia’s role as a host, but also about the growing tensions between national sovereignty, global diplomacy, and the future of digital rights in Africa.
One member of our team, Mamisoa Raveloaritiana, was looking forward to participating in this forum and felt disappointed upon receiving the cancellation notice. We then began searching for information and taking steps to understand the situation.
Screenshot from RightsCon mail message
A Sudden Reversal
RightsCon is not just another conference. Organized by the global advocacy group Access Now, it has become a critical platform for discussing issues such as internet shutdowns, surveillance, artificial intelligence governance, and freedom of expression online. Hosting it in Zambia was seen as a milestone for the African continent an opportunity to center African voices in global digital policy debates.
That promise was cut short.
The government’s explanation focused on procedural issues: unresolved security clearances and the need to ensure alignment with national priorities. Yet the timing and lack of prior warning left many unconvinced. Delegates had already secured visas, booked travel, and prepared to participate. The logistical machinery of a global summit was already in motion.
Beyond the Official Narrative
As details emerged, a more complex and politically sensitive picture began to take shape. Reports from organizers and international observers suggested that external diplomatic pressure may have influenced the decision.
At the center of these claims is the alleged involvement of the Chinese government. According to multiple sources, concerns were raised about the participation of Taiwanese civil society groups and the inclusion of topics considered politically sensitive, including digital surveillance and state control of This pattern is familiar. Across different regions, global forums addressing human rights and governance have increasingly become arenas for geopolitical contestation. In this case, the result appears to have been the silencing of a platform designed to foster open dialogue.
Africa’s Digital Crossroads
The cancellation of RightsCon 2026 carries implications far beyond a single event. It highlights the fragile state of civic space in many parts of the world, including Africa, where digital freedoms are often contested terrain.
Over the past decade, the continent has witnessed a rise in internet shutdowns, increased surveillance measures, and regulatory frameworks that can both enable and restrict digital participation. Against this backdrop, hosting a global summit on digital rights was more than symbolic, it was an opportunity to assert leadership and shape the narrative.
Its cancellation sends a different message.
It raises difficult questions: Who determines what conversations can take place on African soil? To what extent do external powers influence domestic decisions? And how can African nations balance diplomatic relationships with the protection of fundamental freedoms?
The Cost of Silence
Perhaps the most striking irony is this: a conference dedicated to freedom of expression and digital rights was itself curtailed under circumstances that suggest restrictions on both.
For activists and civil society organizations, the loss is immediate. Opportunities for collaboration, visibility, and advocacy have been disrupted. For Zambia, the reputational impact may linger, particularly among those who view the decision as a retreat from openness.
More broadly, the incident reflects a growing tension in the digital age. As technology becomes central to governance and power, the spaces where it is debated are increasingly contested.
Looking Ahead
Africa stands at a critical juncture in shaping its digital future. The continent’s young population, expanding internet access, and dynamic civil society position it as a key player in global discussions on technology and rights. But meaningful participation requires more than infrastructure it requires space. Space to question, to debate, and to dissent.
The cancellation of this summit should not mark the end of that conversation. If anything, it underscores its urgency.
As Voices for Democracy and Justicie in Africa continue to call for accountability, transparency, and digital justice. The conversation that did not happen in Lusaka must find another way and it must be heard.
In solidarity
As a human right organisation, Voices for democracy and justice in Africa, we strongly denounce these violations of the fundamental rights to peaceful assembly and association.We extend our heartfelt solidarity and support to all those most impacted by the actions of the Zambian government.
By Raveloaritiana Mamisoa Isabelle
Please contact Voices for Democracy and Justice in Africa for press enquiries: contact@voicesofordemocracyandjustice.org
